|
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\title{Intermittent Systems at Small Scale: Execution Model and Design Guidelines \\
|
|
\title{Intermittent Systems at Small Scale: Execution Model and Design Guidelines \\
|
|
|
% \thanks{This work was supported by IITP grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No.2021-0-00360, Development of Core Technology for Autonomous Energy-driven Computing System SW in Power-instable Environment).}
|
|
% \thanks{This work was supported by IITP grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No.2021-0-00360, Development of Core Technology for Autonomous Energy-driven Computing System SW in Power-instable Environment).}
|
|
|
-\thanks{This work was supported by IITP grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No.2021-0-00360).}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+\thanks{This work was supported by IITP grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No.2021-0-00360 and RS-2024-00438551).}
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\author{\IEEEauthorblockN{Youngbin Kim and Yoojin Lim}
|
|
\author{\IEEEauthorblockN{Youngbin Kim and Yoojin Lim}
|
|
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Daejeon, Republic
|
|
|
Intermittent systems require software support to execute tasks amid frequent power failures.
|
|
Intermittent systems require software support to execute tasks amid frequent power failures.
|
|
|
In designing such techniques, software designers rely on execution models that abstract hardware-level operations.
|
|
In designing such techniques, software designers rely on execution models that abstract hardware-level operations.
|
|
|
In this paper, we propose an execution model that more accurately describes emerging intermittent systems with small energy storage.
|
|
In this paper, we propose an execution model that more accurately describes emerging intermittent systems with small energy storage.
|
|
|
- Our evaluation shows show that systems designed based on the traditional models can be up to 5.62x less power-efficient than expected and may result in unsafe checkpoint operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ Our evaluations show that systems designed based on the traditional models can be up to 5.62x less power-efficient than expected and may result in unsafe checkpoint operations.
|
|
|
Our design guidelines enhance the performance of existing static and dynamic checkpoint techniques by 3.04x and 2.85x on average, respectively.
|
|
Our design guidelines enhance the performance of existing static and dynamic checkpoint techniques by 3.04x and 2.85x on average, respectively.
|
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
|
|
|
|