|
|
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ Another advantage of the proposed setups is their simplicity and practical appli
|
|
|
Since the both setups only modify the method to detect imminent power failures and leave the checkpoint algorithms unchanged, it is straightforward to apply them in existing checkpoint techniques.
|
|
|
Furthermore, the proposed setups can reduce the complexity of the system, as they eliminate the need for communication (e.g., interrupt or access to $V_{ES}$) between the energy storage system and the computing system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-\subsection{Checkpoint Techniques and Evaluation Methods}
|
|
|
-% \subsection{Design Checkpoint Techniques for Sufficient Power Duration}
|
|
|
+% \subsection{Checkpoint Techniques and Evaluation Methods}
|
|
|
+% % \subsection{Design Checkpoint Techniques for Sufficient Power Duration}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Power failure injection (soft reset)~\cite{wuIntOS2024,yildizEfficient2023}.
|
|
|
+% Power failure injection (soft reset)~\cite{wuIntOS2024,yildizEfficient2023}.
|
